Development Management
Development Management
ISSN 2413-9610 e-ISSN 2663-2365 UDC 004; 005; 35; 336; 65
DOI: 10.57111/devt
Submit an article

Article

Download article

Latvia’s regional reform and its significance for the transformation of local government in Ukraine and Moldova in a changing environment

Natalia Shyshpanova, Aigars Andersons, Lilia Chiriac, Irina Kormyshkina, Liudmyla Prohoniuk

Received 24.12.2025, Revised 14.04.2026, Accepted 19.05.2026 Published 29.06.2026

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the preconditions, nature and consequences of the Latvian reform, as well as to assess the feasibility of applying its individual mechanisms in Ukraine and Moldova within an unstable external environment. The methodological framework of the study was based on the integration of institutional, structural-functional, regulatory-legal, comparative budgetary, spatial and comparative analysis, the method of retrospective comparison of time series, case analysis, institutional modelling, analysis of institutional compatibility and the modelling method. The study found that administrative consolidation without prior strengthening of administrative procedures does not ensure the levelling out of regional disparities. The analysis revealed that the adaptability of governance is determined by the level of coordination, human resource capacity and the integration of digital tools. The results showed that replicating the administrative consolidation model does not produce the same effects in different countries due to differences in the structure of local government and the resource base. In Ukraine, the constraint was not the number of territorial units, but the imbalance in administrative capacity between communities, which was exacerbated by uneven economic development. In the case of Moldova, the analysis revealed the persistence of a fragmented administrative structure, which limits the effectiveness of devolution and hinders the implementation of cohesion policy. A synthesis of the results showed that the implementation of administrative consolidation approaches in Ukraine and Moldova requires a combination of institutional strengthening, financial diversification and the development of digital governance. The practical significance is determined by the formation of an analytical framework for public authorities, think tanks and policymakers involved in reforming the system of territorial administration in Ukraine and Moldova


Keywords:

administrative units; depopulation; public services; consolidation; fragmentation

https://doi.org/10.63341/devt/2.2026.57

Retrieved from Volume 25, No. 2, 2026

Pages 57-73

References Suggested citation

References

  1. Amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia Regulations No. 376 “Procedures for Calculating and Distributing the State Budget Target Grant for the Remuneration of Teachers in Municipal General Education Institutions and State Higher Education Institutions in General Secondary Education Institutions”. (2022, June). Retrieved from https://tapportals.mk.gov.lv/structuralizer/data/nodes/1e1bc155-1868-49b5-a593-33cea3e56f14/preview#.
  2. Armeanic, A. (2025). The social-legal impact of the implementation of the administrative-public reforms of the Republic of Moldova in the framework of the cohesion policy of the European Union. ACROSS Journal of Interdisciplinary Cross-Border Studies, 9(4), 5-13. doi: 10.35219/across.2025.4.01.
  3. Bedriy, R., Diachenko, S., & Shyshykin, S. (2025). Impact of the Ukrainian financial crisis on local self-government functions. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(3), 261-266. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-3-261-266.
  4. Bondarenko, O. (2025). Failure or success? Regime fragmentation in the context of decentralization reform in Ukraine. Democratization, 33(4), 751-774. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2025.2511760.
  5. Brie, M. (2025). EU accession of the Republic of Moldova: The challenges of the internal and geopolitical context. Annals of University of Oradea. Series International Relations and European Studies, 17, 83-106. doi: 10.58603/VFSR9297.
  6. Broks, E., Schewe, C., Buka, A., & Buka, L. (2026). 20 years later: Lessons from Latvia’s accession to the European Union and their implications for Ukraine’s European Union membership. In I. Isokaitė-Valužė & H. Šinkūnas (Eds.), The European Union 2004-2024 (pp. 331-355). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6265-718-2_17.
  7. Bulavynets, O., Shashkevych, O., Gerchakivskіy, S., Gavkalova, N., & Atamas, O. (2026). Digital transformation of the public finance system: Challenges, inclusivity, and prospects for sustainable development. ITEGAM-JETIA, 12(57), 1170-1180. doi: 10.5935/jetia.v12i57.3312.
  8. Bunkus, J., & Cane, R. (2024). The problems of the profession of communication specialists in the processes of local government changes after the administrative territorial reform in Latvia. In Economic science for rural development: Proceedings of the international scientific conference (pp. 268-278). Riga: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.
  9. Burmester, I. (2025). Crisis as a catalyst for democratisation: How Russia’s escalation of the war in Ukraine facilitated democratic progress in Moldova. Contemporary Politics. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2025.2506174.
  10. Buyukeren, B. (2025). Remaking the state from below: Local government formation in Ukraine. SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5874582.
  11. Central Finance and Contracting Agency Republic of Latvia. (2023). EC: Launch of Latvia’s cohesion programmes highlights benefits for people. Retrieved from https://reforms-investments.ec.europa.eu/latvias-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en.
  12. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2021). Population in regions, cities, municipalities, towns, rural territories (based on the boundaries in force at the beginning of 2026), neighbourhoods and densely populated areas by citizenship (experimental statistics). Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/population/population/tables/rig030-population-regions-cities-municipalities.
  13. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2024). Provisional results of general government budget deficit and debt in 2023. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/economy/government-finance/press-releases/20792-provisional-results-general?themeCode=VF.
  14. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025a). In 2024 general government budget deficit fell to 1.8 % of GDP. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/economy/government-finance/press-releases/22947-provisional-results-general?themeCode=VF.
  15. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2025b). 65.8% of GDP of Latvia in 2023 is attributable to the Riga region. Retrieved from https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/economy/national-accounts/press-releases/24724-gdp-regions-2023.
  16. Cornea, S. (2022). The metamorphoses of the territorial organisation of local authority in the Republic of Moldova in the post-communist decades: From the “Soviet rigor” to the “democratic incertitude”. Codrul Cosminului, 28(1), 91-114. doi: 10.4316/CC.2022.01.05.
  17. Dahs, A., Bērziņš, A., & Krūmiņš, J. (2021). Challenges of depopulation in Latvia’s rural areas. In Economic science for rural development: Proceedings of the international scientific conference (pp. 535-545). Riga: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.
  18. Darbaidze, E. (2024). Democratization and attempts to modernize the political system in the Republic of Moldova. Economic and Political Thought, 81(2), 126-140.
  19. Decentralization reform. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/reformi/efektivne-vryaduvannya/reforma-decentralizaciyi.
  20. Douglas, N., & Wolff, S. (2024). Confidence building in the shadow of war: Moldova, transdniestria, and the uncertain future of the 5+2 process. In C. Friesendorf & A. Kartsonaki (Eds.), OSCE insights 2023: Adapting to change (pp. 23-36). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
  21. Dušek, J. (2025). Transformation of settlement structures in Europe: Trends, challenges, and reform approaches. Land, 14(1), article number 167. doi: 10.3390/land14010167.
  22. European Commission. (2021). Priorities for 2021-2027. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/how/priorities_en.
  23. European Commission. (2022a). Global Europe: Neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument. Retrieved from https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/funding-and-technical-assistance/funding-instruments/global-europe-neighbourhood-development-and-international-cooperation-instrument_en.
  24. European Commission. (2022b). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022: Latvia. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/88703.
  25. European Commission. (2023a). EC: Launch of Latvia’s Cohesion Programmes highlights benefits for people. Retrieved from https://www.cfla.gov.lv/en/article/ec-launch-latvias-cohesion-programmes-highlights-benefits-people.
  26. European Commission. (2025). €2 million to strengthen cross-border cooperation between Republic of Moldova and Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/whats-new/newsroom/25-11-2025-eur2-million-to-strengthen-cross-border-cooperation-between-republic-of-moldova-and-ukraine_en.
  27. European Parliament. (2025). Answer given by Ms Kos on behalf of the European Commission. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002159-ASW_EN.html.
  28. Eurostat. (2025). Population change – demographic balance and crude rates at national level. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_gind/default/table?lang=en.
  29. Fuhelo, P., Zharikova, O., Blishchuk, K., Baranovska, T., & Gudzenko, N. (2022). Financial support of territorial communities of Ukraine in the context of decentralization. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 13(3), 291-309. doi: 10.14807/ijmp.v13i3.1979.
  30. Geske, A., Kiseļova, R., & Pole, O. (2022). Quality of education in Latvian municipalities and state cities – results of international studies and state examinations. In L. Daniela (Ed.), Human, technologies and quality of education, 2022: Proceedings of scientific papers (pp. 816-829). Riga: University of Latvia Press. doi: 10.22364/htqe.2022.58.
  31. Hazners, J. (2024). Evaluation of socio-economic impact of Latvian municipal adjustment fund with regression discontinuity design model. In 23rd international scientific conference “Engineering for rural development” (pp. 142-148). Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies.
  32. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2021). Multilevel governance and the coordination dilemma. In A research agenda for multilevel governance (pp. 19-36). Leiden: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781789908374.00008.
  33. Horbliuk, S., & Brovko, O. (2022). The territorial and decentralization reform in Ukraine (2014-2020). Regional and Local Studies, 88(2), 16-30. doi: 10.7366/1509499528802.
  34. Jankova, L., Auzina, A., Grizane, T., & Jurgelane, I. (2020). Socio-economic comparison of the municipalities of Zemgale region in Latvia. In 20th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM 2020 (pp. 463-470). Riga: SGEM. doi: 10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s21.057.
  35. Karvatska, S., Yuriychuk, Y., & Chepel, O.D. (2023). The peculiarities of the reform of local self-government: Examples of Ukraine, Latvia, and Poland. Regional and Local Studies, 92(2), 7-22. doi: 10.7366/1509499529201.
  36. Ketners, K., & Petersone, M. (2024). Exploring the assessment system of municipal finance management: Ensuring sustainability and resilience in Latvian communities. University Economic Bulletin, 2(19), 56-68. doi: 10.69587/ueb/2.2024.56.
  37. Kliuchnyk, A., Shyshpanova, N., Prohoniuk, L., Galunets, N., & Husenko, A. (2025a). The role of local communities in the restoration of agricultural infrastructure after destruction. Scientific Horizons, 28(4), 180-196. doi: 10.48077/scihor4.2025.180.
  38. Kliuchnyk, A., Shyshpanova, N., Sokolik, V., Ostapenko, A., & Kryvko, O. (2025b). Digitalisation of public administration processes in shaping the investment environment of territorial communities. Danube, 16(3), 264-276. doi: 10.2478/danb-2025-0013.
  39. Lagzdina, E. (2025). Public perceptions of circular economy in Latvia: Insights for municipal governance. Sustainability, 17(18), article number 8496. doi: 10.3390/su17188496.
  40. Latvia – monitoring report. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.congress-monitoring.eu/fr/analyse/fr/analyse/fr/recherche/en/legal/en/en/34-pays.html.
  41. Latvian Public Media. (2024). Latvia’s GDP per capita trailed EU peers in 2023. Retrieved from https://eng.lsm.lv/article/economy/economy/27.03.2024-latvias-gdp-per-capita-trailed-eu-peers-in-2023.a548287/.
  42. Law of the Republic of Latvia No. 11 “On Medium-Term Budget Framework for 2021, 2022 and 2023”. (2020, December). Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/ta/id/319409-par-videja-termina-budzeta-ietvaru-2021-2022-un-2023-gadam.
  43. Law of the Republic of Latvia No. 2020/119C.1 “On Administrative Territories and Populated Areas”. (2020, June). Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/315654-administrative-territories-and-populated-areas-law.
  44. Law of the Republic of Moldova No. 225 “On the Voluntary Amalgamation of Administrative-Territorial Units”. (2023, July). Retrieved from https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=138655&lang=ro.
  45. Law of Ukraine No. 1508-VII “On Cooperation of Territorial Communities”. (2014, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/1508-18.
  46. LETA. (2024). Tax revenue in Latvia exceed original plan by 2.7% in 2023. Retrieved from https://bnn-news.com/tax-revenue-in-latvia-exceed-original-plan-by-2-7-in-2023-253780.
  47. Malinovska, G. (2020). Administrative territorial reform. In Proceedings of the international student and teacher scientific and practical conference “Individual. Society. State” (pp. 81-86). Rezekne: Rezekne Academy of Technologies. doi: 10.17770/iss2020.6695.
  48. Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine. (2026). Second phase of EU4Recovery project provides EUR 50 million for community support until 2028: Ministry for Communities and Territories Development. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/druha-faza-proektu-eu4recovery-peredbachaie-50-mln-ievro-na-pidtrymku-hromad-do-2028-roku-minrozvytku?=print.
  49. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia. (2021). Implementation of regional development, territorial cooperation, public services and ICT policies. Retrieved from https://www.fm.gov.lv/lv/4-regionu-attistibas-teritorialas-sadarbibas-publisko-pakalpojumu-un-ikt-politikas-istenosana-3.
  50. Ministry of Smart Administration and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia. (2021a). Minister Plešs: The reform of municipalities has passed control of the Constitutional Court. Retrieved from https://www.varam.gov.lv/en/article/minister-pless-reform-municipalities-has-passed-control-constitutional-court.
  51. Ministry of Smart Administration and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia. (2021b). Under the municipal reform, a further 36 million euro are allocated to the national road investment programme. Retrieved from https://www.varam.gov.lv/en/article/under-municipal-reform-further-36-million-euro-are-allocated-national-road-investment-programme.
  52. Nakrošis, V., Dan, S., & Goštautaitė, R. (2023). The role of EU funding in EU member states: Building administrative capacity to advance administrative reforms. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(1), 1-19. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-01-2022-0008.
  53. National Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Moldova. (2026). Regional statistics: Administrative-territorial organization of the Republic of Moldova as of January 1, 2025. Retrieved from https://statistica.gov.md/index.php/en/statistic_indicator_details/29.
  54. OECD. (2019). OECD economic surveys: Latvia 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/f8c2f493-en.
  55. OECD. (2022). Rebuilding Ukraine by reinforcing regional and municipal governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/63a6b479-en.
  56. OECD. (2023a). Strengthening the innovative capacity of the public sector of Latvia. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/8d3102d9-en.
  57. OECD. (2023b). Public administration in the Republic of Moldova: Assessment against the Principles of Public Administration. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/0bbe9e93-en.
  58. OECD. (2024). Salary systems in public administration and their reforms: Guidance for SIGMA partners. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/8f08a005-en.
  59. Patyka, N., Sokolova, A., Movchaniuk, A., Sysoieva, I., & Khirivskyi, R. (2023). Ukraine’s rural areas in the conditions of decentralization and local self-government reform: Challenges and prospects. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 9(3), 266-295. doi: 10.51599/are.2023.09.03.12.
  60. Radzevics, J. (2023). Legal perspective of the new local government law – new challenges or lack of democracy. In RSU Research week 2023: Places. Rīga: RSU.
  61. Reinholde, I. (2022). Latvia: Designing reforms, understanding change, and anticipating hope. In A. Baimenov & P. Liverakos (Eds.), Public service evolution in the 15 post-Soviet countries (pp. 287-326). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2462-9_9.
  62. Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. (2020). Saeima adopts administrative-territorial reform. Retrieved from https://www.saeima.lv/en/news/saeima-news/29027-saeima-adopts-administrative-territorial-reform.
  63. State Audit Office of Latvia. (2022). The civil protection and disaster management system in Latvia is a neglected area. Retrieved from https://lrvk.gov.lv/en/news/the-civil-protection-and-disaster-management-system-in-latvia-is-a-neglected-area.
  64. State Audit Office of Latvia. (2023). Local and regional governments should start citizen participation in decision-making practically, not formally. Retrieved from https://lrvk.gov.lv/en/news/local-and-regional-governments-should-start-citizen-participation-in-decision-making-practically-not-formally.
  65. Stefanita, A.V. (2022). Transitional mechanisms of local self-government in the member states of the European Union. Public Management, 1(29), 141-148. doi: 10.32689/2617-2224-2022-1(29)-20.
  66. Šteinbuka, I., Austers, A., Barānovs, O., & Malnačs, N. (2022). COVID-19 lessons and post-pandemic recovery: A case of Latvia. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, article number 866639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.866639.
  67. Stohova, O. (2024). Administrative-territorial reform of Ukraine as part of the process of decentralisation of power. JUS-Online Rivista di Scienze Giuridiche, 3, 162-175.
  68. Treffers, F. (2023). People, participation and processes in rebuilding Ukraine at a crossroads. In A. Rubbo, J. Du, M. Thomsen & M. Tamke (Eds.), Design for resilient communities. UIA 2023. Sustainable development goals series. (pp. 177-189). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36640-6_13.
  69. UNDP. (2022). Digitalization in areas other than oblast centres: Challenges and solutions. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/ukraine/blog/digitization-beyond-regional-centers.
  70. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2022). Inter-agency operational update (Ukraine refugee situation), Republic of Moldova. Retrieved from https://data.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/91584.
  71. World Bank. (2022). Moldova to build economic resilience and enhance competitiveness, with World Bank financing. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/06/02/moldova-to-build-economic-resilience-and-enhance-competitiveness-with-world-bank-financing.

Suggested citation

Shyshpanova, N., Andersons, A., Chiriac, L., Kormyshkina, I., & Prohoniuk, L. (2026). Latvia’s regional reform and its significance for the transformation of local government in Ukraine and Moldova in a changing environment. Development Management, 25(2), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.63341/devt/2.2026.57