Development Management
Development Management
ISSN 2413-9610 e-ISSN 2663-2365 UDC 004; 005; 35; 336; 65
DOI: 10.57111/devt
Submit an article

Article

Download article

Cultural determinants of national management models: The feasibility of implementing foreign practices in the Ukrainian IT sector

Daria Posashkova*

darposashkova@gmail.com

Received 11.02.2026, Revised 28.07.2026, Accepted 01.09.2026 Published 29.09.2026

Abstract

Ukrainian management, which emerged as an independent phenomenon relatively recently, is currently transitioning from outdated practices of the Soviet era and actively adopting managerial methods from well-established foreign models, creating the need to analyse the validity of such adoptions. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the feasibility of following foreign management styles in the Ukrainian IT sector based on cultural characteristics. A mixed-methods approach, which includes comparative analysis, generalisation, and synthesis of the theoretical information and case studies of Netflix, Ubisoft, SAP, Spotify, Rakuten, and Kakao, was employed. As a result of this study, the influence of cultural characteristics on the formation of national management models in the modern context was confirmed. Long-term orientation and a focus on innovation were found to be present in each of the investigated models regardless of cultural characteristics. Calculations of Euclidean distances revealed that Ukraine shares the greatest cultural proximity with South Korea and France, while having the fewest similarities with Sweden and the USA. The Ukrainian managerial style was identified by analysing SoftServe’s practices and was compared to other models. The findings indicated that the Ukrainian management approaches generally correspond to the cultural characteristics, highlighting a strong potential for their effective implementation. However, some features were adopted as a result of following foreign managerial practices without taking into account the national mentality. Consequently, recommendations for the adoption of managerial practices that correspond to cultural characteristics were formulated. The practical value of this research lies in the possibility for managers of Ukrainian IT companies and management specialists to utilise these proposals for improving the efficiency of organisational processes and identifying managerial tools that will encounter the least resistance from personnel


Keywords:

adaptation of managerial approaches; managerial efficiency; Ukrainian leadership style; management methods; Hofstede’s theory

https://doi.org/10.63341/devt/3.2026.43

Retrieved from Volume 25, No. 3, 2026

Pages 43-57

References Suggested citation

References

  1. Akhimien, O.G., & Adekunle, S. (2021). Cultural distance and expatriates’ psychological adjustment: The moderating role of perceived social supports. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(5), 1841-1866. doi: 10.1108/IJOA-06-2021-2817.
  2. Alkharafi, N., & Alsabah, M. (2025). Globalization: An overview of its main characteristics and types, and an exploration of its impacts on individuals, firms, and nations. Economies, 13(4), article number 91. doi: 10.3390/economies13040091.
  3. Averkyna, M., & Matvieiev, A. (2025). The influence of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on organizational change management. Economy and Society, 74, 51-57. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2025-74-51.
  4. Aziewicz, D. (2024). Cultural aspects of state ownership policy in the enterprise sector of developed countries. Research on Enterprise in Modern Economy, 2(39), 28-39. doi: 10.19253/reme.2024.02.002.
  5. Chaikova, O., Sitak, I., & Shyriaieva, N. (2026). Managerial challenges and adaptive strategies of Ukrainian companies under wartime market disruptions. European Journal of Management Issues, 34(2), 87-96. doi: 10.15421/192608.
  6. Demianiuk, L. (2022). The Japanese concept of kaizen and the 5 s key principles of success. Academic Papers of V.I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine, 66, 59-69. doi: 10.15407/np.66.059.
  7. Firican, D. (2022). The influence of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on attitude towards change and innovation in organizations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 509-518. doi: 10.2478/picbe-2022-0049.
  8. Frantsyz, Y. (2024). Features of foreign management models at enterprises. In T.M. Melnyk (Ed.), International management in the context of global challenges: Collection of scientific articles by full-time and part-time students (pp. 269-275). Kyiv: State University of Trade and Economics.
  9. Gama, C.A.C., Hartmann, A.M., & Flores, M. (2025). Impact of institutions on cross-border acquisitions and mergers by Latin American firms: A gravitational approach. Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 30(60), 364-384. doi: 10.1108/JEFAS-06-2024-0192.
  10. Girlando, A., Eduljee, N., & Pinchbeck, D. (2026). Convergence, divergence, and crossvergence of national values: The case of Italy and India. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 21(1), 149-165. doi: 10.32381/JPR.2026.21.01.14.
  11. Harkava, V., Slavkova, O., & Volotovska, T. (2024). Risk management in a volatile environment: Challenges for management in Ukraine. Current Issues of Economic Sciences, 1. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13347958.
  12. Hofstede, G. (n.d.a). Country comparison bar charts. Retrieved from https://geerthofstede.com/country-comparison-bar-charts/.
  13. Hofstede, G. (n.d.b). The 6-D model of national culture. Retrieved from https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/.
  14. Hourlias, P. (2023). Agile team organization: A deep-dive on the Spotify model. Retrieved from https://medium.com/found-ation/agile-team-organization-a-deep-dive-on-the-spotify-model-f5b32dfc37dd.
  15. Kakao Corp. (2024). 2024 Kakao ESG report. Retrieved from https://www.kakaocorp.com/media/esg-resource/pdf/Kakao_ESGReport2024_EN.pdf.
  16. Kopchak, Y., Kulinich, T., & Gylka, U. (2021). Practical principles of using approaches to the management of organizations: Experience of Ukraine and foreign countries. Investments: Practice and Experience, 22, 44-48. doi: 10.32702/2306-6814.2021.22.44.
  17. Lee, J.-Y., Ko, D., & Choi, H.-Y. (2025). Is the KKondae as a common psychological construct? Testing the KKondae scale with the U.S. sample, and the preliminary study of predictors and consequences of Kkondae. BMC Psychology, 13(1), article number 212. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02523-4.
  18. Mäkinen, V., & Varis, K. (2023). The differences between Japanese and Western strategic management and the diffusion of management practices in both directions. American Journal of Management, 23(1), 12-26. doi: 10.33423/ajm.v23i1.5870.
  19. Malmi, T., Bedford, D.S., & Brühl, R. (2022). The use of management controls in different cultural regions: An empirical study of Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and Nordic practices. Journal of Management Control, 33(3), 273-334. doi: 10.1007/s00187-022-00342-x.
  20. Mazur, N., Chukhray, N., & Dronyuk, I. (2025). The impact of cultural factors on IT project management effectiveness: Developing the CROSS cycle framework for multicultural teams. Applied Sciences, 15(17), article number 9722. doi: 10.3390/app15179722.
  21. Melnyk, T. (2023). Ukrainian business under conditions of war: Current state, challenges and the ways to solve them. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 7(3), article number 07. doi: 10.51599/is.2023.07.03.07.
  22. Netflix, Inc. (2024). 2024 environmental social governance report. Retrieved from https://s22.q4cdn.com/959853165/files/doc_downloads/2025/6/2024-Netflix-Environmental-Social-Governance-Report.pdf.
  23. Netflix, Inc. (n.d.a). A supportive supporting cast. Retrieved from https://jobs.netflix.com/work-life-philosophy .
  24. Netflix, Inc. (n.d.b). Netflix culture: The best work of our lives. Retrieved from https://jobs.netflix.com/culture.
  25. Netflix, Inc. (n.d.c). Netflix launches new training programme to develop next generation of UK creatives. Retrieved from https://about.netflix.com/en/news/netflix-launches-new-training-program-to-develop-uk-creatives.
  26. Oh, H.-W. (2026). Kakao restructures decision-making committee in wake of controversy over outsize influence. Retrieved from https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/business/kakao-restructures-decision-making-committee-in-wake-of-controversy-over-outsize-influence/12480346 .
  27. Perevozova, I., Shayban, V., & Dedeliuk, O. (2023). Realities and prospects of domestic and international management: Direct priorities, future forecast. Economy and Society, 53, 34-45. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-53-34.
  28. Petko, S.M. (2023). Management features of the South-Korean corporations in the digital paradigm of development. Economics: Time Realities, 5(69), 77-89. doi: 10.15276/ETR.05.2023.7.
  29. PlusPlus. (n.d.). How Netflix scales high-quality peer-to-peer learning with PlusPlus. Retrieved from https://plusplus.co/customers/netflix.
  30. Rakuten Group, Inc. (2024). Integrated report 2024: Driven by innovation. Retrieved from https://global.rakuten.com/corp/investors/assets/doc/documents/ar_2024_all.pdf.
  31. Rakuten Group, Inc. (n.d.). Rakuten shugi (Rakuten basic principles). Retrieved from https://global.rakuten.com/corp/about/philosophy/principle./
  32. Rakuten Today. (n.d.). Rakuten’s 20th anniversary: Our unique corporate culture. Retrieved from https://rakuten.today/blog/rakuten-corporate-culture.html.
  33. Robul, Y., Kuznietsov, E., & Radchenko, O. (2025). Cultural dimensions and values as determinants of management in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(5), 326-333. doi: 10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-5-326-333.
  34. SAP SE. (2025). 2025 SAP integrated report. Retrieved from https://www.sap.com/docs/download/investors/2025/sap-2025-integrated-report.pdf.
  35. Şenkaya, E. (2022). Implementation of Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to multinational construction management. In 7th international project and construction management conference (IPCMC2022), Istanbul: IPCMC.
  36. Shorobura, I.M. (2023). Modern models of international management. Innovative Pedagogy, 58(2), 145-150. doi: 10.32782/2663-6085/2023/58.2.30.
  37. Silaban, D.E. (2025). Factors determining economic growth: Analysis and implications for the global economy. International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science, 3(4). doi: 10.58451/ijebss.v3i4.233.
  38. SoftServe. (2024). SoftServe sustainability report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.softserveinc.com/files/csr/softserve-corporate-social-responsibility-report-2024.pdf.
  39. SoftServe. (n.d.a). Belonging: Diversity, equity and inclusion. Retrieved from https://www.softserveinc.com/en-us/corporate-social-responsibility/diversity-equity-and-inclusion.
  40. SoftServe. (n.d.b). SoftServe launches generative AI lab. Retrieved from https://www.softserveinc.com/en-us/news/softserve-launches-generative-ai-lab.
  41. SoftServe. (n.d.c). SoftServe migrates communication and collaboration platforms from Skype for Business to Microsoft Teams and Zoom. Retrieved from https://www.softserveinc.com/en-us/resources/softserve-migrates-platforms-to-ms-teams-and-zoom.
  42. SoftServe. (n.d.d). We are SoftServe: Our values. Retrieved from https://www.softserveinc.com/en-us/about-us/our-values.
  43. Spotify. (2021). Why you should pair with non-engineers. Engineering at Spotify. Retrieved from https://engineering.atspotify.com/2021/03/why-you-should-pair-with-non-engineers.
  44. Spotify. (2025). Equity & impact report 2025. Retrieved from https://s29.q4cdn.com/175625835/files/doc_governance/2026/Mar/02/Spotify-Equity-Impact-Report-2025-bf4ab6.pdf.
  45. Spotify. (n.d.a). Employee experience: Benefits and perks. Life at Spotify. Retrieved from https://www.lifeatspotify.com/the-way-we-play/benefits-and-perks.
  46. Spotify. (n.d.b). Our 3 values – the bassline. Life at Spotify. Retrieved from https://www.lifeatspotify.com/the-way-we-play.
  47. Suslov, P. (2024). Comparison of management types in international companies: European, American and Japanese approaches. Investments: Practice and Experience, 21, 139-144. doi: 10.32702/2306-6814.2024.21.139.
  48. Trzaskowska-Dmoch, A., Kocot, M., Gontarek, I., Radowicki, S., Oleksiejuk, J., & Stasiak, J. (2025). A management model in an agile organization based on the example of a company Spotify. European Research Studies Journal, 28(2), 51-70. doi: 10.35808/ersj/3964.
  49. Ubisoft. (2025). 2024-25 universal registration document and annual financial report. Retrieved from https://staticctf.ubisoft.com/8aefmxkxpxwl/2jOPqNEzotGX0odqDUt5jr/57f0ba952c3be14b38ba97a02b17c119/Ent_AGM_2025.07.10_URD_GB_Interactif_def.pdf.
  50. Ubisoft. (2026). Ubisoft reports full-year 2025-26 earnings figures. Retrieved from https://staticctf.ubisoft.com/8aefmxkxpxwl/1LR2VCCkksmsZ3BDdDrpQW/3bbed93696b39f8e2d8cebf527afb025/Ubisoft_FY26_PR_English_vF.pdf.
  51. Ubisoft. (n.d.a). About us. Retrieved from https://www.ubisoft.com/en-us/company/about-us/.
  52. Ubisoft. (n.d.b). Creative process. Retrieved from https://www.ubisoft.com/en-us/company/how-we-make-games/creative-process.
  53. Ubisoft. (n.d.c). Diversity, inclusion and accessibility. Retrieved from https://www.ubisoft.com/en-us/company/about-us/diversity-inclusion-accessibility.
  54. Ubisoft. (n.d.d). Ubisoft la forge. Retrieved from https://www.ubisoft.com/en-us/studio/laforge.
  55. University of Pennsylvania. (2023). 2023 update to longitudinal cross-national distance data. Retrieved from https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Guillen_Dist-Downloads_Instructions_2023.pdf.
  56. Uygur, M., & Peyravi, B. (2025). Business resilience and strategic responses in Ukraine and Lithuania during the Russia-Ukraine conflict: Insights from the energy, agriculture, and manufacturing sectors. Business: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 62-77. doi: 10.3846/btp.2025.22164.
  57. Yip, J.C. (2018). Why T-shaped people? Retrieved from https://jchyip.medium.com/why-t-shaped-people-e8706198e437.

Suggested citation

Posashkova, D. (2026). Cultural determinants of national management models: The feasibility of implementing foreign practices in the Ukrainian IT sector. Development Management, 25(3), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.63341/devt/3.2026.43