Українська
Ostapenko, V.
(2022).
Scientific approach to the formation of stakeholder interaction in the innovative economy.
Development Management,
21(4),
19-27.
http://doi.org/10.57111/devt.20(4).2022.19-27
English
Article
Scientific approach to the formation of stakeholder interaction in the innovative economy
Received 12.09.2022, Revised 25.11.2022, Accepted 20.12.2022
Abstract
The relevance of involving stakeholders in the decision-making process is due to the need to identify, group and classify them based on their circumstances or views on potential business conditions that can be realised, which will allow predicting interaction with stakeholders in conditions of dynamic opportunities. The purpose of the study was to define stakeholder interaction as a normative concept with implementation practice that can stimulate the development of theory and provide practical application in practice. The basis of the formation of a scientific approach to the formation of the interaction of stakeholders in the innovative economy were such methods as structural and comparative analysis, the method of generalisation. A scientific approach to the formation of stakeholder interaction is proposed, which involves an integrated process of their interaction in an innovation network based on dynamic capabilities with elements of model variable analysis. This enables the adjustment of the elements of the innovation network, the nature of relations with stakeholders and promotes the evolution of commitment, relations and knowledge sharing between stakeholders, as well as the adjustment, reflection and adaptation of interaction with stakeholders and consists of: the formation of an information space to define the components of the innovation network and relationships in the process of stakeholder interaction; implementation of the process of interaction of stakeholders in conditions of dynamic opportunities; reasoned choice of management decisions regarding the impact on the interaction of stakeholders. The research findings reflect a stakeholder interaction framework based on a process of identification, organisation and transformation integrated into co-creation and value, innovation network and knowledge sharing. The obtained results can be applied in the practical activities of state authorities and local governments, higher educational institutions, state enterprises, organisations and institutions, private entrepreneurial structures in the formation of intellectual, scientific resources and information technologies, effective use and qualitative improvement of all factors of production, which will contribute development of a new quality of public-state relations
Keywords:
innovation network; knowledge exchange; business relations; identification; organisation; transformation
- 737 Views
- Read article
References
[1] Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. (2015). Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
[2] Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. doi: 10.2307/258888.
[3] Fobbe, F., & Hilletofth, P. (2021). The role of stakeholder interaction in sustainable business models. A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327, article number 129510. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129510.
[4] Miles, S. (2011). Stakeholder definitions: Profusion and confusion. In Proceedings of the EIASM 1st Interdisciplinary Conference on Stakeholder, Resources and Value Creation, IESE Business School. Barcelona: University of Navarra.
[5] Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113-135. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9677-4.
[6] Littau, P., Jujagiri, N.J., & Adlbrecht, G. (2010). 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984-2009). Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17-29. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20195.
[7] Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 285-298. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1090-8.
[8] Gallie, W.B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198.
[9] Stanford Research Institute. (1963). Internal memo (unpublished). Menlo Park: Stanford Research Institute.
[10] Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
[11] ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on project management. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/50003.html.
[12] A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (4th ed.). (2008). Retrieved from https://www.works.gov.bh/English/ourstrategy/Project%20Management/Documents/Other%20PM%20Resources/PMBOKGuideFourthEdition_protected.pdf.
[13] A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (5th ed.). (2013). Retrieved from https://ceulearning.ceu.edu/pluginfile.php/305454/course/overviewfiles/PMBOKGuide_5th_Ed.pdf?forcedownload=1.
[14] Project Management Institute. (2016). Requirements management: A practice guide PMI. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute.
[15] Vargo, S.L., & Lusch, R.F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(5), 5-23. doi: 10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3.
[16] Ranjan, K.R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 44, 290-315. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0397-2.
[17] Galvano, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: A systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 643-683. doi: 10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0187.
[18] Najera Sanchez, J.J., Ortiz de Urbina Criado, M., & Mora Valentin, E.M. (2020). Mapping value co-creation literature in the technology and innovation management field: A bibliographic coupling analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, article number 588648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588648.
[19] Shams, S.M.R., Vrontis, D., Chaudhuri, R., Chavan, G., Czinkota, M.R. (2020). Stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurial development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 119, 67-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.036.
[20] Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 4-14. doi: 10.1002/dir.20015.
[21] Haleem, F., Farooq, S., Cheng, Y., & Waehrens, B.V. (2022). Sustainable management practices and stakeholder pressure: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14, article number 1967. doi: 10.3390/su14041967.
[22] Ketonen-Oksi, S., & Valkokari, K. (2019). Innovation ecosystems as structures for value co-creation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(2), 24-34. doi: 10.22215/timreview/1216.
[23] Takahashi, S., & Takahashi, V.P. (2021). Integrated co-creation process with multiple stakeholders in innovation networks. Innovation & Management Review, 2021, 1-18. doi: 10.1108/INMR-10-2020-0142.
[24] Pluchinotta, P., Salvia, G., & Zimmermann, N. (2022). The importance of eliciting stakeholders’ system boundary perceptions for problem structuring and decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research, 302(1), 280-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.029.
[25] Zingraff-Hamed, A., Hüesker, F., Lupp, G., Begg, C., Huang, J., Oen, A., Vojinovic, Z., Kuhlicke, C., & Pauleit, S. (2020). Stakeholder mapping to co-create nature-based solutions: Who is on board? Sustainability, 12, article number 8625. doi: 10.3390/su12208625.